Quantcast
Channel: News Releases
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2814

PETA Challenges Feds Over Paltry Fee Paid by Lawbreaking, Abusive Circus

$
0
0

Carson & Barnes Lies About Penalty, Animal Welfare Violations on Its Website

For Immediate Release:
November 7, 2012

Contact:
Shakira Croce 202-483-7382

Hugo, Ok. -- Today, PETA sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) regarding the shockingly low $3,714 penalty that the agency recently issued to Carson & Barnes Circus to settle 10 violations of the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA). In its letter, PETA points out that this fine—which is $96,286 less than the maximum penalty of $100,000—will have no financial impact on a business that took in $6.7 million in sales in 2011 and urges the OIG to investigate the USDA penalty scheme that OIG has criticized for more than two decades and take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that the AWA is effectively enforced.

"The USDA's current penalty scheme is so ineffective that circuses view these tiny fines—such as the $400 Carson & Barnes paid after its animal-care director was caught on tape beating, whipping, and shocking elephants—as no more than a cost of doing business," says PETA Foundation Director of Captive Animal Law Enforcement Delcianna Winders. "PETA is calling on the USDA to fully enforce the AWA and no longer allow circuses like Carson & Barnes to go on abusing elephants with barely a slap on the wrist."

PETA's letter to the OIG points to other signs of Carson& Barnes' disregard for the law, including the false claim on its website that the circus has had 12 AWA violations between 2003 and 2010—when, in reality, it has had 18—and its claim that "no further action" was taken regarding three of the AWA violations that were, in reality, the reasons for the circus's recent fine. PETA has contacted Carson & Barnes separately to demand that the circus remove these false claims from its website.

For more information, please visit PETA.org

 

PETA's letter to the USDA Office of Inspector General follows.

 

November 7, 2012

 

Phyllis K. Fong
Inspector General
U.S. Department of Agriculture 
Rm. 117-W Jamie Whitten Bldg.
1400 Independence Ave. S.W.
Washington, DC 20250

 

Re: USDA's failure to implement OIG's stipulated penalty recommendations; recent Carson & Barnes (No. 73-C-0001) penalty

Dear Ms. Fong:

I am counsel to PETA, and I am writing regarding a recent Settlement Agreement in which the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) stipulated to a paltry $3,714 penalty to chronic Animal Welfare Act (AWA) violator, Carson & Barnes Circus Co., Inc. ("Carson & Barnes"), to settle 10 violations of the AWA, including an elephant escape and eight other violations that directly endangered the public and animals. (See Ex. 1.) Although Carson & Barnes faced a maximum penalty of $100,000 for these violations, the USDA assessed a fine of less than 4 percent of that maximum—a drop in the bucket to a company with $6.70 million in sales for 2011. (See Ex. 2.) Such a miniscule penalty—if it can even be called that—has no deterrent impact whatsoever. Indeed, just one week after the Settlement Agreement was entered into, Carson & Barnes was again found in violation of the AWA. (See Ex. 3.)

As detailed in the attached appendix, over the past two decades your office has issued four audit reports—in 1992, 1995, 2005, and 2010—finding that the USDA's stipulated penalties were so low that they provide no deterrent effect and that AWA licensees view them as merely a cost of doing business. The instant matter demonstrates that the USDA's penalty scheme remains ineffective and in desperate need of revision in order effectuate the AWA's statutory policy to "insure that animals intended for use … for exhibition purposes … are provided humane care and treatment" (7 U.S.C. § 2131(1)). Please investigate the recent settlement agreement with Carson & Barnes and, more broadly, the USDA's continued failure to implement necessary changes to its penalty scheme and take all appropriate action based upon your findings.

Thank you for your time.

Very truly yours,

Brittany Peet
Counsel


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2814

Trending Articles